Search the site
I feel that the FTC Rule should be abolished because it does not take into consideration the needs of current franchisees.
U.S. Federal Trade Commission
April 17, 1997
Public Comment
John
http://www.wikidfranchise.org/public-comment-132
they take place or either abolish the Franchise Rule, the FTC Rule, altogether and give franchisees the right to bring the franchisor into court when they participate in the abuses that they do.
For Review
http://www.wikidfranchise.org/public-comment-182
nobody out there left to protect us and the franchisors know it, and that's how the abuse occurs. And it's just got to stop. And the only solution I have is to abolish the FTC Rule and give us a private
http://www.wikidfranchise.org/public-comment-185
of current franchisees, then I'm in favor of abolishing the Franchise Rule. Thank you for your consideration. Good bye.
For Review, see FTC “Table of Commenters”
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/franchise
http://www.wikidfranchise.org/public-comment-189
If the FTC cannot begin addressing the issues of current franchisees, then I am in favor of abolishing the Franchise Rule. If, as it seems, a person qualifies for protection from an overreaching
http://www.wikidfranchise.org/public-comment-140
decisions at the time of signing your 1st contract.
If the FTC can not address these issues then I am in favor of abolishing the franchise rule!
David Weaver
ten.thgirb|imod#ten.thgirb|imod
CC: "John Rachide
http://www.wikidfranchise.org/public-comment-141
Association, AFA, Ban gag orders, Ban waivers of legal rights, Disputes heard on franchisor’s home turf, Mandatory arbitration (no trial), Integration clauses, Non-compete restrictions, Abolish the FTC Rule, United States, 19970429 Comment 45
http://www.wikidfranchise.org/public-comment-158
waivers of legal rights, Disputes heard on franchisor’s home turf, Mandatory arbitration (no trial), Integration clauses, Non-compete restrictions, Abolish the FTC Rule, United States, 19970429 Comment 52
http://www.wikidfranchise.org/public-comment-165
, Ban gag orders, Ban waivers of legal rights, Disputes heard on franchisor’s home turf, Mandatory arbitration (no trial), Integration clauses, Non-compete restrictions, Abolish the FTC Rule, United States, 19970429 Comment 42
http://www.wikidfranchise.org/public-comment-155
, AFA, Ban gag orders, Ban waivers of legal rights, Disputes heard on franchisor’s home turf, Mandatory arbitration (no trial), Integration clauses, Non-compete restrictions, Abolish the FTC Rule, United States, 19970429 Comment 47
http://www.wikidfranchise.org/public-comment-160
